Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mai Hontama vs Veronika Erjavec Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hontama vs Erjavec analysis and find out who is favored!
Mai Hontama vs Veronika Erjavec Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hontama 0 - 0 Erjavec
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hontama has won 44.47% of points on his second serve, while Erjavec has won 47.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hontama, in recent form, has won 58.71% of his opponent's second serve points, while Erjavec has won 59.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.46% and 41.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hontama has saved 51.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Erjavec has saved 49.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hontama has won 58.33% of matches played (W/L 49/ 35), with Erjavec winning 67.12% (W/L 49/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hontama has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 191/ 113), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 22/ 18). Erjavec has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 188/ 94), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Hontama has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.36% of matches (W/L 27/ 17), where as Erjavec has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 49/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hontama has played against opponents with an average rank of 206.73 while Erjavec has played against players with an average rank of 297.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hontama has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Erjavec has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hontama has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Erjavec has converted 46.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hontama 0 - 0 Erjavec
115
Rank
108
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
176
Rank
169
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
62% (253-158)
Career Total W/L
64% (217-123)
55% (18-15)
YTD W/L
62% (23-14)
$394,667
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mai Hontama | Veronika Erjavec |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (18/15) | 62% (23/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (41/37) | 62% (53/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (370/347) | 54% (413/357) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (16/12) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 80% (16/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (6/8) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 29 | 36 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 63 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:50 | 1:38:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 190.18 | 288.32 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1703/2415) | 68% (1640/2425) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (983/1703) | 61% (993/1640) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (315/712) | 47% (370/785) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (157/315) | 47% (171/366) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (1121/2339) | 48% (1239/2574) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (9/6) | 68% (23/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (18/33) | 62% (23/37) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 83% (5/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 42% (5/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (19/15) | 88% (24/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (19/4) | 13% (24/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 15% (13/2) |
Mai Hontama Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Mai Hontama
55%
(
46 of
84)
1st Serve %
77%
(
67 of
87)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Amandine Hesse
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lina Gjorcheska
Player
Mai Hontama
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
48%
(
46 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Radka Zelnickova
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Arina Rodionova
Player
Mai Hontama
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
34 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Haruka Kaji
68%
(
78 of
114)
1st Serve %
76%
(
90 of
119)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
48 of
90)
33%
(
12 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
46%
(
52 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
112
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Kimberly Birrell
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Mai Hontama
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
45 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Rebecca Marino
72%
(
81 of
112)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
43%
(
48 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
103
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Veronika Erjavec Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Veronika Erjavec
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
83%
(
76 of
92)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
24%
(
10 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
49 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Lina Gjorcheska
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Xinyu Gao
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Raluca Georgiana Serban
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
74%
(
62 of
84)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Veronika Erjavec
67%
(
71 of
106)
1st Serve %
74%
(
77 of
104)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
45 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Ipek Oz
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Sinja Kraus
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
48%
(
14 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
51%
(
22 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
45
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Tatiana Prozorova
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Polona Hercog
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hontama Vs Erjavec Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
